Archive for April, 2010

Short Take: What's different shouldn't be different, and what's familiar should have been original. An overall wasted opportunity.

Director: Samuel Bayer (feature debut)

Screenwriters: Wesley Strick (Wolf, Doom), Eric Heisserer

Cast: Jackie Earle Haley (Watchmen, Little Children), Kyle Gallner (Jennifer’s Body), Rooney Mara (Youth in Revolt), Katie Cassidy (Black Christmas (2006))

Length: 1h 35m

Synopsis: In an unsuspecting suburban town various teens begin to experience frightening nightmares that are dangerously real. And in those nightmares they all come across the same evil man named Fred Krueger who continually tries to viciously murder them. Some teens fall victim to his assaults, the rest try to find a way to stop him – and keep from falling asleep. Pieces of the puzzle begin to fit together, which lead the surviving few to a final confrontation with their supernatural terror. To come out on top, they’ll have to literally fight their fears. Read the rest of this entry »

This May's "Iron Man 2" will be the latest summer vehicle designed to appeal to the biggest audience possible. How is it this came to be? Is it a good thing?

With the summer movie season nearly upon us (officially beginning with the release of Iron Man 2 on May 7^th), I naturally got pulled into another conversation with a fellow moviegoer who felt the need to express his contempt for this time of year. According to him, and I’m sure many of you out there as well, the summer months are reserved for when Hollywood likes to flex its corporate muscles and make boat loads of cash by feeding the masses the intellectual equivalent of junk food. Basically, if it’s loud and shiny, it sells. But the movie studios are not entirely to blame, as it’s also the fault of the audiences who readily pay their hard earned money to sit stupefied at a screen while their senses get pushed to the limits (Michael Bay’s Transformers movies were listed as examples several times during the conversation).

This is one way to look at it.

Read the rest of this entry »

Writer/Director Bill Condon

The fourth film in the Summit Entertainment series, Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn, has now hired Bill Condon as its director. Condon is perhaps the series’ most respected director to date, helming the Oscar nominated films Dreamgirls (Nom. Best Supp. Actor Eddie Murphy, Won Best Supp. Actress Jennifer Hudson) and Kinsey (Nom. Best Supp. Actress Laura Linney).

Commenting on the opportunity to direct a film that’s part of such a huge franchise, Condon said, “I’m very excited to get the chance to bring the climax of this saga to life onscreen,” said Condon. “As fans of the series know, this is a one-of-a-kind book — and we’re hoping to create an equally unique cinematic experience” -HR.

Summit Entertainment production president Erik Feig expressed his delight with the decision to hire Condon, saying, “Bringing Stephenie Meyer’s Breaking Dawn to the screen requires a graceful and intelligent hand, and we believe Bill Condon is exactly the right steward, having shown equal and abundant talents of immense creativity and subtle sensitivity” -HR.

Condon also won an Oscar for writing the adapted screenplay for Gods and Monsters.

______________________________________________________________

The next installment in the Twilight series, Twilight Saga: Eclipse, is directed by David Slade (Hard Candy, 30 Days of Night) and is set to release June 30th.

Source: Hollywood Reporter

Short Take: Largely romantic and surprisingly clever

Director: Gary Winick (Bride Wars, 13 Going on 30)

Screenwriters: Jose Rivera (The Winged Man, The Tape Recorder), Tim Sullivan (Flushed Away, Jack and Sarah)

Cast: Amanda Seyfried (Dear John, Mamma Mia!), Christopher Egan (Resident Evil: Extinction, Eragon), Vanessa Redgrave (Atonement, Eva), Gael Garcìa Bernal (Rudo y Cursi, Blindness, Y Tu Mama Tambien)

Length: 1hr 53mins

Synopsis: When aspiring journalist Sophie (Seyfried) and fiancé Victor (Bernal) go to Verona, Italy on a pre-wedding honeymoon, she discovers a group of women called the Secretaries of Juliet who respond to letters lovelorn women write to William Shakespeare’s fictional character Juliet.  While working with the secretaries, Sophie discovers a letter written 50 years prior by a woman who ran away instead of eloping with her Italian lover, Lorenzo.  Sophie responds to the letter and is startled when the woman, Claire (Redgrave), and her handsome but uptight grandson Charlie (Egan) come to Verona to find Lorenzo.  So, Sophie decides to aid them as they search for Claire’s first love. Read the rest of this entry »

Short Take: Fun, but ultimately superficial

Director: Sylvain White (Stomp the Yard)

Screenwriters: Peter Berg (Very Bad Things), James Vanderbilt (Zodiac, Basic)

Cast: Jeffrey Dean Morgan (Taking Woodstock, Watchmen), Zoe Saldana (Avatar, Star Trek), Chris Evans (Sunshine), Jason Patric (Narc)

Length: 1h 38m

Synopsis: A smoking aces U.S. special ops team gets double-crossed during a routine mission in Bolivia, and as a result they get the blame for the deaths of over two dozen innocent children. After faking their deaths to escape the CIA they work towards finding a way to get back to the states, but money is tight and options are limited. Opportunity finally knocks in the form of a mysterious woman with wealth, connections, and a serious attitude. Once back in America the group makes it a point to hunt down the person(s) responsible for framing them. Read the rest of this entry »

This year's version of The A-Team may be part of a new team trend for on-screen heroes

This upcoming summer movie season there are three movies that will be about a group of well trained special ops-type fighters who don’t “play by the rules,” starting with this weekend’s The Losers. This film, inspired by the comic book series of the same name, deals with a group of individual CIA black ops operatives who band together to find and kill whoever betrayed them and left them for dead. The other two films similar to this are The A-Team and The Expendables. The former is, if you don’t know already, based off of the TV series of the same name that first aired in 1983 about four ex-military men who were framed for a crime they didn’t commit and go about trying to clear their names, and the latter deals with a group of mercenaries hired to overthrow the vicious dictator of the small South American country of Vilena.

Well what’s so interesting about the fact that these films are releasing within a couple months of each other? Everyone one knows that Hollywood is a copycat town, right? The answer is both yes and no. Yes, studios like to hang their hats on proven formulas and trends, but that some trends appear at all is often reflective of the cultural mood of our country. Over the past few years there has been a heavy influx of films dealing with individual heroes, many of them being of the “super” variety. But aside from Batman, Superman, Spider-Man, and Iron Man, there were John McClain, Rambo, Indiana Jones, and James Bond. Obviously, none of these rogue stand-alone men did everything by themselves (Batman had Alfred, Iron Man had Pepper Pots, James Bond had MI6, etc.), but by and large they did all of the most difficult and dangerous things by themselves. Americans love heroes that are individualistic and autonomous. They’ve loved them like that for decades and will continue to love them for decades more. What seems so peculiar about The Losers, The A-Team, and The Expendables being released in one summer season, then, is that the team concept stands out so sharply from this crowd of actioners.

These three movies are hardly pioneering new ground, of course, as the X-Men trilogy made the point during the middle of the first super hero wave of the new century that working as a team for a common goal is the real and only way to make progress. However the three films in question seem to have their sights set a lot lower than achieving social understanding and ridding the world of prejudice. In the case of The Losers, for example, the goal is simply to get revenge on the group’s would-be assassinators. So, because the scope is miniscule and the benefits gained from the group’s success are specific to just them, the individualistic sense is still ever-present. And, the same might be said of The A-Team as well. Because the goal in The Expendables is to overthrow a dictatorship it can be argued that the benefits of the heroes victory would not be exclusive to just them but would also include the entire citizenship of Vilena. So, you could say the sense of individual empowerment would at least not be the same variety found in the other two films. However, it is interesting to point out that The Expendables are a group made up of mercenaries, who are a breed of people not known for their team mentalities.

What do you all make of this? Is the concept of working as a team against evil going to become the new wave in action movies, or is it just a phase? Do you expect to see these films come close to enjoying the type of success that Iron Man 2 will no doubt garner? Which type of hero do you emulate the most? Which do you enjoy watching the most? Voice your opinions and let it be known what you think a true hero really is.

We’ll revisit this topic once all three films have been released (which will be mid-August) and ask you these same questions again. Then we’ll compare your responses to try and come to some sort of conclusion. Till then, just enjoy the movies!

Hooray candy!

As we mentioned in a recent article about movie theaters, candy, popcorn, and other treats have been part of the moviegoing experience since the 1930s. Over the years some of the selections have changed, but by and large traditions have been upheld. Not everyone likes to enjoy a snack at the movies, but if you do what I would like to know is which theater treat is your favorite?

The old standbys include popcorn (with or without “butter”), Twizzlers, Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, Sour Patch Kids, Milk Duds, Junior Mints, Reese’s Pieces, Mike and Ikes, Hot Tamales, M&Ms (regular, peanut, etc.), Raisinettes, Goobers, Snow Caps, Lemon Heads, Skittles, Hershey’s chocolate bars, and Starbursts. With so many choices, it’s hard to settle on a favorite if you’re a candy lover. But if you had to pinpoint the one treat you simply could not live without if you were to have the ideal theater experience, what would it be?

Tell us by leaving a comment on this post or writing to our Contact page, and we’ll let you all know what the final tallies are in a few weeks. Support your favorites and chime in!

FYI: As most of you know, the “butter” on movie theater popcorn is not actually butter. What it actually is, is primarily corn oil mixed with various flavor additives, as well as butter. Depending on which theater you go to, one such additive could be peanut oil. So those of you who are deathly allergic to peanuts might want to consult your local theaters on their “butter” ingredients (typically big chains such as AMC or Regal don’t use fake butter that has peanut oil because of this reason, but better safe than sorry).

Hollywood Video already filed for bankruptcy, and all the signs indicate that Blockbuster will be next

In an editorial for IGN.com, writer Cindy White examines the unenviable situation that video stores are in with having to compete with elements like Netflix, Hollywood studios, new customer standards, and age. White pays particular attention to Blockbuster Inc., which at one time was the lone video rental giant but is currently staring down the proverbial barrel of the Chapter 11 gun.

The CEO of Blockbuster, Jim Keyes, recently spoke to the L.A. Times and suggested that what Netflix doesn’t provide his company does, which is the immediate availability of new releases. What perhaps Keyes fails to understand about the renting market is that people who wish to rent movies are more interested in renting what they want from a greater selection than  catching up on what the industry has recently pumped out. Mainstream video stores have never been famous for their wide selections, and charging per-movie viewing fees from their online collection is probably not the way to compete with Netflix’s offering of unlimited online viewings for subscribers.

What White eventually concludes is that Blockbuster is holding on to the past, and that is why they are failing. The company recently signed an agreement with Warner Bros., 20th Century Fox, and Universal which will allow them to show all new DVD releases from these studios without having to wait the 28 day window that Netflix and Redbox must. This gives them a leg up by having the most updated selection, but Netflix in particular agreed to the delay in exchange for a greater selection for online viewing. All of Blockbuster’s moves to fend off bankruptcy indicate that it’s thinking more about the present, while Netflix is clearly thinking about the future.

By the end of her article White comes to the same conclusion that most have, which is that Blockbuster is simply delaying the inevitable. She claims that despite the company’s best efforts so far, it’s quickly heading towards irrelevancy. Mind you not all video rental stores are as doomed as Blockbuster. The business that once nearly had the video rental market cornered is simply proving that without proper management and a sharp eye on the horizon no company is big enough to survive the changing of the times; And you best believe it, the times they are a changin’.

Quick Opinion: Though the article hardly goes into much detail, the point is well made that in the video rental market the tides are changing and Blockbuster is being left behind. What stinks even more for the company is that even though they reportedly signed with the three big studios to make sure they are allowed to rent new DVD releases the possibility still exists that those same studios will eventually forbid rental companies from renting out new releases in order to raise actual DVD sales. In many cases studios get more money from DVD sales than theater grosses, but because DVD sales on the whole have been dipping slightly over the past year they’re trying everything to get them to go back up. If a buy-only period comes to pass, Blockbuster will lose its only redeeming quality with customers. Such a loss would be the final nail in the coffin, assuming Blockbuster stays alive long enough to see the day that happens. The company’s main downfall has been its lack of quality service (it reinstated late fees), higher prices, and limited selection. In other words, it failed to meet the demands of the market. My guess as to why this is the case is probably the same as yours in that the suits who ran the company probably felt so empowered by their success at the height of the rental store era (1999 or so) that it didn’t take competitors like Netflix seriously. Would’a, could’a, should’a.

Short Take: Tons of action and laughs, as well as surprisingly introspective

Director: Matthew Vaughn (Stardust)

Screenwriters: Matthew Vaught and Jane Goldman (Stardust); based on comic books by Mark Millar and John Romita Jr.

Cast: Aaron Johnson (The Illusionist), Chloe Moretz (500 Days of Summer), Nicolas Cage (The Bad Lieutenant), Christopher Mintz-Plasse (Role Models), Mark Strong (Sherlock Holmes)

Length: 1h 57m

Synopsis: Dave Lizewsky (Johnson) was a painfully average teenage boy growing up in New York City. One day, however, he asked himself a very serious question: why hasn’t anyone actually tried to be a super hero? Although it’s not the most realistic or feasible endeavor to pursue – or safest for that matter – he convinces himself that he should nevertheless give the idea a serious try because standing up to crime is the right thing to do. Through his efforts Lizewsky discovers the serious drawbacks to his idea by getting beaten half to death, but after recouping he dusts himself off and, after some hard-fought success with dishing out justice, is rewarded with praise and admiration from the city’s populous. Unbeknownst to him, however, his fame and actions become a thorn in the side of one of the city’s biggest crime lords, Frank D’Amico (Mark Strong). But is this teen, self-named Kick-Ass, the real nuisance, or is it someone else? Read the rest of this entry »

Short Take: Palatable and amusing, but doesn't offer much originality

Director: Shawn Levy (Night at the Museum, The Pink Panther, Cheaper by the Dozen)

Screenwriter: Josh Klausner (Shrek the Third, The 4^th Floor)

Cast: Steve Carell (The Office, Get Smart, Dan in Real Life), Tina Fey (30 Rock, Baby Mama, Mean Girls), Mark Wahlberg (The Lovely Bones, The Departed)

Length: 1 hour 28 minutes

Synopsis: When New Jersey couple Phil (Carell) and Claire (Fey) Foster worry their marriage has lost its spark, they alter their usual weekly date night plans and head to a popular new Manhattan restaurant.  However, when they arrive, the restaurant is too crowded so they steal another couple’s reservation.  Unfortunately, the couple from whom they stole the reservation, the Tripplehorns, is in trouble with a powerful and dangerous gangster and when the gangster’s henchmen mistake the Fosters for the Tripplehorns, Phil and Claire must spend the rest of their night trying to set things right.

Note: This review contains details that some might consider spoiling Read the rest of this entry »