<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Movie-Thoughts &#187; Double Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movie-thoughts.com/category/double-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com</link>
	<description>Thinking Hard, Not Hardly Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 09:53:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; Is the gore of the &#8216;Saw&#8217; films justifiable?</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/24/double-feature-is-the-gore-of-the-saw-films-justifiable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/24/double-feature-is-the-gore-of-the-saw-films-justifiable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostel: Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saw VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...I would claim that torture films can be considered artistic, and thus if a torture film’s artistic merit can be defended then it is justifiable insofar that it is a valid cultural artifact. Not all torture films can be sufficiently defended, but the possibility is there nonetheless.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/24/double-feature-is-the-gore-of-the-saw-films-justifiable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; Best Picture nominees increase to 10</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/08/double-feature-best-picture-nominees-increase-to-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/08/double-feature-best-picture-nominees-increase-to-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Academy is paying lip service when they insist that the addition of these types of nominees will increase their chances of winning the Best Picture award. What the extra nominees will really be – if box-office sensations are indeed the kinds of films that will plug the remaining five holes – is an attempt at pandering; A proverbial dangling of the carrot. Being that there are 5,800 voters who collectively determine which films get nominated and which film wins the award it is impossible to predict with certainty which film will win for any given year. But the fact remains that the voters themselves are not changing. This means, also, that their tastes and evaluative judgments are not changing. The increase in the number of final nominees does not change the selection of films eligible for nomination. So, increasing the number of nominees from five to ten is meaningless from an odds standpoint.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/08/double-feature-best-picture-nominees-increase-to-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; Vulgarity in &#8216;The Ugly Truth&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/09/05/double-feature-vulgarity-in-the-ugly-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/09/05/double-feature-vulgarity-in-the-ugly-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 03:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forgetting Sarah Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Segal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Heigl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knocked Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mila Kunis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RottenTomatoes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and the City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hangover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wedding Crashers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulgar comedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite a number of critics complained of the film’s vulgarity, and not because it was any more offensive than the average film but because it was so unexpected in a romantic comedy aimed mainly at women.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/09/05/double-feature-vulgarity-in-the-ugly-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; &#8220;New Moon&#8221; Trailer</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/08/23/twilight-trailer-double-feature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/08/23/twilight-trailer-double-feature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marisa &#8211; On Tuesday, August 11th, Summit Entertainment released a teaser trailer for the next installment in the Twilight series, New Moon.  Let me rephrase that: what they really did was release a fourteen second teaser trailer for a full-length trailer that was to be released a few days later on Friday the 21st.  Besides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/08/23/twilight-trailer-double-feature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
