<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Movie-Thoughts &#187; Double Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.movie-thoughts.com/category/double-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com</link>
	<description>Thinking Hard, Not Hardly Thinking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Conversation About &#8216;Drive&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/10/03/conversation-about-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/10/03/conversation-about-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 06:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[action thriller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bourne trilogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bronson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brutality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carey Mulligan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drive movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goodfellas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Scorsese]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mean Streets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Refn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raging Bull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Gosling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve McQueen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxi Driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis Bickle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western aesthetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[westerns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although it might be a bit untimely to talk at length about Drive nearly three full weeks after it opened on Sept. 16th, we at Movie-Thoughts thought it to be an even worse idea to not talk about it at all. Our Marisa Carpico did of course write a glowing review of the film, directed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/10/03/conversation-about-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Conversation About &#8220;Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/07/21/a-conversation-about-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/07/21/a-conversation-about-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 20:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Relevance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Radcliffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Watson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotional Attachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fantasy Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ginny Weasley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter Books vs. Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hermione Granger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord Voldemort]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOTR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Adaptations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planet of the Apes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Weasley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Grint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Severus Snape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spice World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Poseidon Adventure Remake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=2380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 concludes the Potter film franchise that has lasted eight films and ten years. Thanks to its devoted worldwide fan base, the film is breaking box office records left and right. Critics are also showering the film with praise: it received a 97% on Rotten Tomatoes, the highest for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/07/21/a-conversation-about-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Conversation About &#8216;Transformers 3&#8242;</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/07/07/a-conversation-about-transformers-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/07/07/a-conversation-about-transformers-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 05:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Dream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autobots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema of spectacle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decepticons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explosions and hot chicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye candy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fireworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis McDormand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Duhamel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Dempsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriotism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rosie Huntington-Whiteley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seal Team Six]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentinal Prime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The King's Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers: Dark of the Moon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trilogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter's Bone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=2321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transformers: Dark of the Moon has quickly become a box office phenomenon, pretty much just like most of us thought it would. However, what has been surprising is the relatively positive word of mouth the film has earned. After the critical failure of Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen expectations were exceedingly low for the third [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2011/07/07/a-conversation-about-transformers-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; Is the gore of the &#8216;Saw&#8217; films justifiable?</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/24/double-feature-is-the-gore-of-the-saw-films-justifiable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/24/double-feature-is-the-gore-of-the-saw-films-justifiable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cronenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostel: Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saw VI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...I would claim that torture films can be considered artistic, and thus if a torture filmâ€™s artistic merit can be defended then it is justifiable insofar that it is a valid cultural artifact. Not all torture films can be sufficiently defended, but the possibility is there nonetheless.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/24/double-feature-is-the-gore-of-the-saw-films-justifiable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; Best Picture nominees increase to 10</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/08/double-feature-best-picture-nominees-increase-to-10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/08/double-feature-best-picture-nominees-increase-to-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Academy is paying lip service when they insist that the addition of these types of nominees will increase their chances of winning the Best Picture award. What the extra nominees will really be â€“ if box-office sensations are indeed the kinds of films that will plug the remaining five holes â€“ is an attempt at pandering; A proverbial dangling of the carrot. Being that there are 5,800 voters who collectively determine which films get nominated and which film wins the award it is impossible to predict with certainty which film will win for any given year. But the fact remains that the voters themselves are not changing. This means, also, that their tastes and evaluative judgments are not changing. The increase in the number of final nominees does not change the selection of films eligible for nomination. So, increasing the number of nominees from five to ten is meaningless from an odds standpoint.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/10/08/double-feature-best-picture-nominees-increase-to-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; Vulgarity in &#8216;The Ugly Truth&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/09/05/double-feature-vulgarity-in-the-ugly-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/09/05/double-feature-vulgarity-in-the-ugly-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 03:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forgetting Sarah Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard Butler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jason Segal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katherine Heigl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knocked Up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mila Kunis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RottenTomatoes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and the City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hangover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wedding Crashers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulgar comedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite a number of critics complained of the filmâ€™s vulgarity, and not because it was any more offensive than the average film but because it was so unexpected in a romantic comedy aimed mainly at women.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/09/05/double-feature-vulgarity-in-the-ugly-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Feature &#8211; &#8220;New Moon&#8221; Trailer</title>
		<link>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/08/23/twilight-trailer-double-feature/</link>
		<comments>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/08/23/twilight-trailer-double-feature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clifford Bugle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Double Features]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.movie-thoughts.com/?p=99</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marisa &#8211; On Tuesday, August 11th, Summit Entertainment released a teaser trailer for the next installment in the Twilight series, New Moon.  Let me rephrase that, what they really did was release a fourteen second teaser trailer for a full-length trailer that was to be released a few days later on Friday the 21st.  Besides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.movie-thoughts.com/2009/08/23/twilight-trailer-double-feature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

