Posts Tagged ‘Memento’

If you haven’t already, read Part 1 here to see our interpretation of the film’s ending.

Part 2 – Taking a Leap of Faith

Being able to visit dreams is no doubt a concept that is difficult to grasp, especially once you try to consider all of the philosophical possibilities attached to such an idea. That this concept forces us to adapt the foundations of our methods of critical thinking, and indeed logic itself, because we are no longer dealing with the “real” but unbridled cognitive enterprise, we must resort to a manner of thinking that requires pure conjectural reasoning and rationality. By this I am suggesting that it would behoove our intentions to successfully explore this movie by thinking more abstractly about it (theoretically, conceptually, etc.), in addition to relying on concrete cues provided by the film’s text* (details observable in some form or fashion that lead to confirmed or implied conclusions). By doing this it may be possible to discover the film’s main goal and purpose. Read the rest of this entry »

Spider-Man (2002) helped make superheros relevant again in Hollywood

In a feature article on FilmSchoolRejects.com, author Landon Palmer lists what he argues are the most influential films of the past 10 years. The list includes such popular movies such as The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter franchises, The Dark Knight, Memento, Borat, The Passion of the Christ, Traffic, and No Country for Old Men, among others. But his list is not fabricated on the basis of popularity alone, as he also takes into consideration the impact these films have on each other, and their relativity with their social and historical contexts. Palmer writes very intelligibly; clearly articulating ideas that are grounded in logic and defended with sound reasoning. You may not agree with him on every choice he makes, but you’ll at least understand why he chose the movies he did and likely admit that said choices are not indefensible.

Some of the more interesting films he mentions are Munich and Jarhead, neither of which were big box-office bonanzas. These two were particularly political in their makeup, Palmer claims, but not preachy such as films like Fahrenheit 9/11 or The Passion of the Christ. However, Palmer goes on to say that these films’ political nature makes them inexorably tied to the contexts of their times, and thus probably wont stand the test of time as well as others on the list. At this juncture it’s impossible to say whether he could be right or wrong, but if such films are as influential as he claims it can’t be thought that them standing the test of time is impossible. Films of the ‘70s like Taxi Driver and Easy Rider were saturated in social and political commentary, yet they’ve lasted as cinematic symbols of excellence for decades.

Palmer’s article, doubtless to lead to controversy simply because of its nature (that is, as an argument), is an exceedingly interesting and impressive read for anyone interested in taking a look in the rearview mirror at the past decade of movies. No other articles I’ve found that take such practices, say, on Variety or that ilk, are as good as this. A highly recommended read.